nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software Defined Networks
From: Ryan Landry <ryan.landry () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:27:14 -0700
"SDN" is a broad brush. Here's a "concrete example" of using software to do interesting network tricks. I'm biased, of course. https://www.fastly.com/blog/building-and-scaling-fastly-network-part-1-fighting-fib https://www.fastly.com/blog/building-and-scaling-fastly-network-part-2-balancing-requests Cheers, Ryan On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 10:58 AM Rod Beck <rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com> wrote:
Can someone explain what is all the fuss? SDN is like the latest telecom craze but the articles do a poor job of explaining the advantages. I seek concrete examples. Regards, Roderick. Roderick Beck VP of Business Development United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com New York City & Budapest rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com 36-70-605-5144 [image: 1467221477350_image005.png]
Current thread:
- Software Defined Networks Rod Beck (Dec 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Ishmael Rufus (Dec 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Nick Morrison via NANOG (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks lobna gouda (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Töma Gavrichenkov (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Ishmael Rufus (Dec 04)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Bryan Holloway (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Jörg Kost (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Bruce H McIntosh (Dec 06)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Miles Fidelman (Dec 05)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Large Hadron Collider (Dec 12)
- Re: Software Defined Networks Quan Zhou (Dec 12)
