nanog mailing list archives
Re: 5G roadblock: labor
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:57:44 +0200
On 30/Dec/19 16:40, jdambrosia () gmail com wrote:
Ultimately this will come down to market demand.
I think this will largely be driven by the business case as the MNO's see it. If there is anyone complaining about 4G/LTE, please raise your hand. Mark.
Current thread:
- 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Matt Hoppes (Dec 30)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor jdambrosia (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Dec 31)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Matthew Petach (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor Keith Medcalf (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Brandon Martin (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Matt Hoppes (Dec 30)
