nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers
From: "Compton, Rich A" <Rich.Compton () charter com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:47:41 +0000
That's great! Do you guys have plans to publish ROAs for your own netblocks? If so, can you please share info on your
process (tools, pitfalls, etc.)? Thanks!
On 2/11/19, 7:55 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Jay Borkenhagen" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of jayb () braeburn
org> wrote:
FYI:
The AT&T/as7018 network is now dropping all RPKI-invalid route
announcements that we receive from our peers.
We continue to accept invalid route announcements from our customers,
at least for now. We are communicating with our customers whose
invalid announcements we are propagating, informing them that these
routes will be accepted by fewer and fewer networks over time.
Thanks to those of you who are publishing ROAs in the RPKI. We would
also like to encourage other networks to join us in taking this step
to improve the quality of routing information in the Internet.
Thanks!
Jay B.
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers, (continued)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Nick Hilliard (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Denis Fondras (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Job Snijders (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Matthew Walster (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Nick Hilliard (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Michael Hallgren (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Job Snijders (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Matthew Walster (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Owen DeLong (Feb 13)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Jay Borkenhagen (Feb 11)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Alex Band (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Jay Borkenhagen (Feb 14)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Jay Borkenhagen (Feb 11)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers John Sweeting (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Owen DeLong (Feb 12)
- Re: AT&T/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers Job Snijders (Feb 12)
