nanog mailing list archives
Re: Latency question - Juniper MX960 vs the Tellabs 8860
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:53:14 +0200
Hey Steve, 15us would be more than you'll realistically see in uncongested MX960, but it is in the ball-bark. I've not tried Tellabs, if customer is latency sensitive you probably want to look constant time pipeline devices rather than run to completion npus. You'll see low single digit us on typical box. Remember that 10us is just 2km of fibre (1km of RTT). On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:28 PM Steve Danello <the76posse () gmail com> wrote:
Looking for two latency profiles, best/worst cast would be great for the Telllabs 8860 and Juniper MX960. Looks like the Juniper may be in the 15us range Both cases would be a 10Gb -1Gb and 1Gb - 10Gb We’d understand the serialization piece; really looking to provide a customer the hardware latency, we don’t have a great means to test them Thanks all! Steve
-- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Latency question - Juniper MX960 vs the Tellabs 8860 Steve Danello (Feb 13)
- Re: Latency question - Juniper MX960 vs the Tellabs 8860 Saku Ytti (Feb 13)
- Re: Latency question - Juniper MX960 vs the Tellabs 8860 Steve Danello (Feb 13)
- Re: Latency question - Juniper MX960 vs the Tellabs 8860 Saku Ytti (Feb 13)
