nanog mailing list archives
Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 14:20:51 +0200
Hey Tim,
I would advise against InfluxDB in this case - flow data has a very high (and open) tag cardinality which is not suited to Influx (although their recently new index format has improved this).
I'm not entirely sure I understand. Does this mean the permutations of tags are high, i.e. series count is high? If so, isn't this general problem and advice against all TSDBs? If so, I fully agree, you couldn't/shouldn't make for example IP addresses your tags, potentially creating 2**32*2 series without any other tags, it's rather non-sensical proposal in TSDB. Influx themselves comment that >10M series is likely infeasible. So you need unique tag combinations to be low millions at most. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors H I Baysal (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Tim Raphael (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Saku Ytti (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Tim Raphael (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors H I Baysal (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Saku Ytti (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors H I Baysal (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Tim Raphael (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Saku Ytti (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Tim Raphael (Jan 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Phil Lavin (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Daniel Rohan (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Nick Peelman (Jan 02)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
- Re: Service Provider NetFlow Collectors Aaron (Jan 03)
