nanog mailing list archives
Re: plaintext email?
From: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:43:21 -0700
On 01/15/2019 11:37 AM, bzs () theworld com wrote:
P.S. No, you already read the quoted text, that's how it got to be quoted text.
Are you making reference to having read the quoted text in a different email?
An email that someone might not have received, much less read yet? -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email?, (continued)
- Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Brian Kantor (Jan 15)
- Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
- Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? John Levine (Jan 15)
- Re: Top Posting Was: Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? Tei (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? Stephen Satchell (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? William Herrin (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? James R Cutler (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? Brian J. Murrell (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? Bryan Fields (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? cosmo (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? Aled Morris via NANOG (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? Christopher Morrow (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? Bryan Fields (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? bzs (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? John Levine (Jan 15)
- Re: plaintext email? cosmo (Jan 15)
