nanog mailing list archives

RE: BGP Experiment

From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund () medline com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:32:01 +0000

Sorry.  Correction.

If it IS RFC compliant they should accept the attribute.  If it is NOT, they should drop (and maybe log it).

Steve

Contact your hardware vendor.  That is not acceptable behavior.  If it is not RFC compliant they need to accept the 
attribute, if it's not RFC compliant they should gracefully >ignore it.  Now we all know that anyone using that gear 
is vulnerable to a DoS attack.  Won't be long until anyone else sends that to you.

Steven Naslund
Chicago IL

Current thread:

Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 10)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 22)
  - Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Job Snijders (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Eric Kuhnke (Jan 23)
    - RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Aled Morris via NANOG (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
    - RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
    - RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Filip Hruska (Jan 23)
    - RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment William Herrin (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Nikolas Geyer (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment James Jun (Jan 23)
    - Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)

(Thread continues...)