nanog mailing list archives
RE: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS
From: "Aaron Gould" <aaron1 () gvtc com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:36:10 -0600
In my isp network of ~50,000 subscribers, I run about (200) mpls p/pe nodes in one ospf area with dual rr cluster for mp-ibgp type mpls overlay services. seems fine to me. -Aaron
Current thread:
- [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Steven Bahnsen (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Beecher (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Hill (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Saku Ytti (Jan 25)
- RE: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Aaron Gould (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 25)
- Re: [ROUTING] Settle a pointless debate - more commonly used routing protocol in total deployments - OSPF vs IS-IS Randy Bush (Jan 25)