nanog mailing list archives

Re: really amazon?

From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian () interlinx bc ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:28:10 -0400

On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 23:13 +0300, Scott Christopher wrote:


Because it will get spammed if publicly listed in WHOIS.


I will take that at *least* as ironic as you meant it.

b.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Current thread:

Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?), (continued)
- - - Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Joe Provo (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Robert McKay (Jul 30)
    - Not noreply autoresponder (WAS: really amazon?) Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Christoffer Hansen (Jul 30)
  - Re: really amazon? Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 30)
- Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
  - Re: really amazon? Richard Williams via NANOG (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Valdis Klētnieks (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Brian J. Murrell (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Scott Christopher (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Rich Kulawiec (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Landon Stewart (Jul 31)
    - Re: really amazon? Stephen Satchell (Jul 31)