nanog mailing list archives
Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard?
From: Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 05:13:33 -0400
On 5/18/19 4:44 AM, Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote:
That one seems to be the simpler form, depending only on an external DHCP server. It may be enough for some set-ups. Subscriber functionality provides more options, such as enforcing auth and internal dhcp server that takes data to be returned from RADIUS. It also allows dissociation between L2 and L3 (same subnet on several VLANs).You can almost call it SDN:)
It's perfect for lots of smaller networks that have L2 DHCP snooping and access enforcement via that means. My L2 happens to offer just that. I do have to enforce a somewhat "traditional" L2-L3 mapping, but it works fine on this network, at least.
-- Brandon Martin
Current thread:
- DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Brandon Martin (May 14)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Tim Howe (May 17)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Ross Tajvar (May 17)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Brandon Martin (May 17)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 17)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Brandon Martin (May 18)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 18)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Brandon Martin (May 18)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Brandon Martin (May 18)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Tim Howe (May 17)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Mikael Abrahamsson (May 18)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Brandon Martin (May 18)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Mikael Abrahamsson (May 18)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Brandon Martin (May 21)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD relay route injection - standard? Brandon Martin (May 18)
