nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:56:24 -0700
On 11/4/19 1:55 AM, Chris Knipe wrote:
We are experiencing a situation with a 3rd party (direct peer), wanting to advertise DoD address space to us, and we need to confirm whether they are allowed to do so or not.
That sounds like someone is squatting on DoD IP space, likely for something like CGN and (hopefully inadvertently) wanting to advertise it to you.
This thread got me to wondering, is there any legitimate reason to see 22/8 on the public Internet? Or would it be okay to treat 22/8 like a Bogon and drop it at the network edge?
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Chris Knipe (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Alarig Le Lay (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Chris Knipe (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Jason Biel (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Chris Knipe (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Robert McKay (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tom Beecher (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Jason Biel (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space David Guo via NANOG (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Joe Provo (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Chris Knipe (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space Grant Taylor via NANOG (Nov 04)
- Moving DoD traffic... Richard (Nov 04)
- Re: DoD IP Space David Conrad (Nov 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Töma Gavrichenkov (Nov 05)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tom Beecher (Nov 05)
