nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP
From: "Rampley, Jim F" <jim.rampley () charter com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 17:20:40 +0000
Hi Phil,
Contact me off list with the locations impacted and I will look into it.
Jim
On 10/2/19, 7:00 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Phil Lavin" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of phil.lavin () cloudcall
com> wrote:
> While we can say this should just work, the reality is, it's not very reliably true and I would not build product
or business on the assumption that it works well.
Yup. Understood. We can't get away from sending multi-packet messages. We try our best to keep SIP messages as
small as possible though sometimes certain optional features required by customers push it beyond their MTU. We're also
starting to see decreasing MTUs as customers deploy various SD-WAN solutions and it's tough to keep up with these when
you're already teetering on the edge of what used to be considered a fairly common minimum MTU value.
We can, of course, get away from using UDP. We can and do run SIP over TCP and indeed over TLS on TCP though the
stateful nature of TCP often makes this undesirable. We see a lot of SIP phone implementations that do not handle TCP
connection failures very well and result in a loss of calls for a period of minutes if this happens, as they take a
while to notice the connection has dropped and should be re-established. Pros and cons of each.
If anyone has any specific information about Spectrum CPE changes or indeed any contacts who may be able to
interrogate this internally within Spectrum that would be appreciated.
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.
Current thread:
- Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP Phil Lavin (Oct 02)
- Re: Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP Saku Ytti (Oct 02)
- RE: Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP Phil Lavin (Oct 02)
- Re: Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP Rampley, Jim F (Oct 02)
- Re: Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP Tarko Tikan (Oct 02)
- Re: Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP Dovid Bender (Oct 02)
- RE: Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP Phil Lavin (Oct 02)
- RE: Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP Phil Lavin (Oct 03)
- Re: Spectrum (Charter) Fragmented UDP Saku Ytti (Oct 02)
