nanog mailing list archives
Re: Consistent routing policy?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:41:57 +0200
On 16/Sep/19 20:26, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
Not always.
No, longest match ALWAYS wins.
E.g. imagine an ISP who has two connections to the outside world: one through a major ISP and the other through an IX. Such an ISP would be quite inclined both financially and technically to import routes just from the IX and set the default to the upstream ISP link. Therefore, an advertisement from the IX would always win no matter the length.
Which is why I included, in my previous message: So, for example, if the upstream to whom you are sending the /21 doesn't do anything about how they learn the /22 from another source, (for their network)... Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Consistent routing policy?, (continued)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Ben Logan (Sep 16)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Arie Vayner (Sep 16)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Martijn Schmidt via NANOG (Sep 16)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Ross Tajvar (Sep 16)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Niels Bakker (Sep 16)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Töma Gavrichenkov (Sep 16)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Owen DeLong (Sep 16)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Töma Gavrichenkov (Sep 16)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
- Re: Consistent routing policy? Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
