nanog mailing list archives
Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers?
From: Ben Cannon <ben () 6by7 net>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:37:04 -0700
In the scope and performance of their duties includes any work involving essential telecommunications expansion or restoration - then yes. And agreed. They save lives. Period. Call before you dig. Please. -Ben Ms. Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC CEO ben () 6by7 net <mailto:ben () 6by7 net> "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world."
On Apr 21, 2020, at 11:57 AM, Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote: Utility markers don't get the recognition they deserve. If they aren't essential workers, they should be.... and get hazard pay. They help protect everyone's fiber and cables and pipes that go boom.
Current thread:
- Are underground utility markers essential workers? Sean Donelan (Apr 21)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Jeff Shultz (Apr 21)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Jared Mauch (Apr 21)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Josh Luthman (Apr 22)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Jared Mauch (Apr 21)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Brandon Martin (Apr 21)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? William Herrin (Apr 21)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Ben Cannon (Apr 21)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Wayne Bouchard (Apr 21)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Nick Hilliard (Apr 22)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Bjørn Mork (Apr 22)
- Re: Are underground utility markers essential workers? Jeff Shultz (Apr 21)
