Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

["John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>]

In article <3b0bc95b-c741-7561-1692-75fac74d5883 () mtcc com> you write:
> I'd definitely appreciate symmetric, or at least better in upstream. 
> Obviously zoom and all of that has made a lie of us not needing 
> upstream. It would make cloud based "filesystems" more feasible too.
>
> But the larger point is why bother going to all of that effort if you're 
> just going roll it out with low bandwidth? I mean, 100Mbps isn't even 
> competitive with cable these days. But they're a somewhat crazy amalgam. 
> They have POTS everywhere, cable tv everywhere, cable IP in some areas 
> and DSL in others. I wish I knew somebody there to talk to this about 
> because it's really odd.

I agree it is odd to make 100/100 the top speed. The fiber service I
have from my local non-Bell telco offers 100/100, 500/500, and
1000/1000. FiOS where you can get it goes to 940/880.

The obvious guess is that their upstream bandwidth is
underprovisioned, or maybe they figure 100/100 is all they need to
compete in that particular market.

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl () taugh com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly