Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

First we moved the entire internet to TCP/443.

Now we propose moving it all to UDP/53.

What’s next? Why not simply eliminate port numbers altogether in favor of a single 16-bit client-side unique session 
identifier.

Owen

> On Feb 21, 2020, at 15:20 , Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 13:31 Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz () bromirski net <mailto:lukasz () bromirski net>> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Now… once we are aware, the only question is — where we go from here?
>
> — 
> ./
>
>
> Well, it's clear the UDP 443 experiment wasn't entirely successful.
>
> So clearly, it's time to use the one UDP port that is allowed through at the top of everyone's ACL rules, and update 
> QUIC in the next iteration to use UDP/53.
>
> *THAT* should solve the whole problem, once and for all.
>
> ;)
>
> Matt