Re: Tell me about AS19111

[bzs () theworld com]

It could measure the extent of the problem and would be within what I
suggested.

For example if there were only one AS being abused that would make it
a different priority than 1,000 or 10,000 (some seem to be implying a
number like that) being abused.

Do we have that number?

And tracking the trend.

On February 6, 2020 at 14:50 sandy () tislabs com (Sandra Murphy) wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2020, at 2:38 PM, bzs () theworld com wrote:
> >
> >
> > It would likely be a lot better than "someone on NANOG noticed a
> > discrepancy let's shout at each other about it for a few days."
>
>
> Did I miss something?  I thought the discrepancy being pointed out was that resources that were not currently 
> allocated/assigned were still being actively used and actively accepted by people who should have rejected them.  
> Private address space and private ASNs are one case, resources that have not yet been allocated or were once 
> allocated and have been reclaimed are another.
>
> An accounting audit of ARIN resource management process is not going to help the fact that people are accepting 
> routes they should not be accepting.
>
> I suspect I did miss something.
>
> —Sandy

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs () TheWorld com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*