nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual Homed BGP
From: "Cummings, Chris" <ccummings () coeur com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:22:39 +0000
We have full tables from 2 ISPs at just one datacenter, and it is nice in the case of partial reachability issues—If
one ISP loses access to routes to a destination but the other one doesn’t, for example. For us, the decision to do full
tables was easy, as we are running 2 MX150s which can very easily handle the load and convergence is still less than a
minute or so. As far as optimal path goes, full tables really doesn't help us much, so we made sure to get matching
speed circuits just to make things simple. We have AT&T and CenturyLink, and most things prefer CenturyLink as they are
pretty well peered due to all of their acquisitions. It would be interesting to see a distribution plot of ASPATH
length, I would bet that a huge chunk of our routes are only 2-3 hops away.
/chris
On 1/24/20, 10:56, "NANOG on behalf of Ben Cannon" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of ben () 6by7 net> wrote:
Honestly, this. Your only real choice is what of 2 pipes to chuck it out of.
Full tables vs partial and a default don’t make the process much more intelligent for 1 site dual homed, and as
mentioned routing policy will have more influence.
-Ben
> On Jan 24, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote:
>
> It’s pretty pointless for a small ISP to get full routes, because the BGP tables are so highly manipulated. It’s
better to just get “company” routes for each upstream, and then use your own traffic engineering via prepending and
static or policy routes to balance the outbound traffic the way you like.
>
> -mel
>
>> On Jan 24, 2020, at 8:40 AM, Brian <brian.bsi () gmail com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello all. I am having a hard time trying to articulate why a Dual Home ISP should have full tables. My
understanding has always been that full tables when dual homed allow much more control. Especially in helping to
prevent Async routes.
>>
>>
>> Am I crazy?
Current thread:
- Dual Homed BGP Brian (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mel Beckman (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Ben Cannon (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Cummings, Chris (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Ben Cannon (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Job Snijders (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Chriztoffer Hansen (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Amir Herzberg (Jan 27)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Jay Hennigan (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Gavin Henry (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Baldur Norddahl (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Baldur Norddahl (Jan 24)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Tore Anderson (Jan 25)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Baldur Norddahl (Jan 25)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Jon Lewis (Jan 24)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP Mel Beckman (Jan 24)
