nanog mailing list archives
RE: Huawei on Mount Everest
From: "Aaron Gould" <aaron1 () gvtc com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 13:07:52 -0500
You made me curious... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_died_climbing_Mount_Everest wow, I guess it would be great to be able to use cell/gps technology to communicate with and track a lost/endangered climber -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+aaron1=gvtc.com () nanog org] On Behalf Of John Levine Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 12:58 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Huawei on Mount Everest In article <CAPLq3UMBY32ctWWSbNYd_QiXpHLb=YOxoXhBtacSeBRYEBO7JA () mail gmail com> you write:
-=-=-=-=-=- https://telecoms.com/504051/huawei-and-china-mobile-stick-a-5g-base-station-on-mount-everest/ Why dont we leave the Everest alone? OTOH, we can now have tiktok videos and latest instagram posts from the summit.
Given how dangerous the ascent is, I would think it would be a good thing for climbers to be able to check in and say whether they are OK. I agree it's mostly a publicity stunt, though.
Current thread:
- Huawei on Mount Everest Glen Kent (May 01)
- Re: Huawei on Mount Everest Jeff Shultz (May 01)
- Re: Huawei on Mount Everest John Levine (May 01)
- RE: Huawei on Mount Everest Aaron Gould (May 01)
- Re: Huawei on Mount Everest Eric Tykwinski (May 01)
- RE: Huawei on Mount Everest Keith Medcalf (May 02)
- Re: Huawei on Mount Everest Mark Rousell (May 02)
- Re: Huawei on Mount Everest David Conrad (May 01)
- RE: Huawei on Mount Everest Aaron Gould (May 01)
- Re: Huawei on Mount Everest William Herrin (May 01)
- Re: Huawei on Mount Everest Wayne Bouchard (May 01)
