nanog mailing list archives
Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit
From: James Jun <james.jun () towardex com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:44:42 -0400
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:28:12PM +0000, Luke Guillory wrote:
No issues with HE, only gripe was that if you had transit along with IX peering, traffic will always prefer transit over IX ports.
That's how it's supposed to work, and is not specific to HE. Customer routes > peer routes Most providers wouldn't allow simultaneous peer + customer relationship, but in this case, I would argue that HE is doing you a favor by leaving your settlement-free peering adjacency in place, for you to dump outbound traffic toward their customers for free. James
Current thread:
- Zayo or HE for IP transit James Lumby (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 20)
- RE: Zayo or HE for IP transit Luke Guillory (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit James Jun (Apr 20)
- RE: Zayo or HE for IP transit Luke Guillory (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Robert Blayzor via NANOG (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Mike Lyon (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Nuno Vieira via NANOG (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Adam Thompson (Apr 20)
- Re: Zayo or HE for IP transit Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 20)
