nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNSSEC Best Practices
From: Robert Story <rstory () isi edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:31:01 -0400
On Wed 2021-04-28 12:02:18+0200 Mark wrote:
On 4/28/21 11:51, Tony Finch wrote:Yes. I recommend p256 because the security advantages of p384 are not significant enough to justify the increased costs in space (packet size) and time.Both 13 and 14 are already smaller than 8 (which is the most widely deployed algorithm today).
For those interested, actual numbers for algorithm deployment can be found in the DNSSEC parameter frequency analysis section of https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/. -- Robert Story <http://www.isi.edu/~rstory> USC Information Sciences Institute <http://www.isi.edu/>
Current thread:
- DNSSEC Best Practices Eric Germann via NANOG (Apr 27)
- Re: DNSSEC Best Practices Arne Jensen (Apr 27)
- Re: DNSSEC Best Practices Mark Tinka (Apr 28)
- Re: DNSSEC Best Practices Tony Finch (Apr 28)
- Re: DNSSEC Best Practices Mark Tinka (Apr 28)
- Re: DNSSEC Best Practices Robert Story (Apr 28)
- Re: DNSSEC Best Practices Arne Jensen (Apr 27)
- Re: DNSSEC Best Practices Ca By (Apr 27)
- Re: DNSSEC Best Practices Mark Tinka (Apr 28)
