RE: RTBH and Flowspec Measurements - Stop guessing when the attack will over

[Jean St-Laurent via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

Interesting,

 

Do I read it right that there is no workaround, but the solution is to upgrade to an updated version which include the 
fix?

 

The solution is just above the workaround. From the same page posted.

https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content 
<https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA11101&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST> 
&id=JSA11101&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST

 

Solution:

The following software releases have been updated to resolve this specific issue:

Junos OS: 15.1R7-S8, 15.1X49-D240, 17.3R3-S10, 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S4, 18.1R3-S12, 18.2R2-S8, 18.2R3-S6, 18.3R3-S4, 
18.4R1-S8, 18.4R2-S6, 18.4R3-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3, 19.2R3-S1, 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3-S1, 19.4R1-S3, 19.4R2-S3, 19.4R3, 
20.1R2, 20.2R1-S3, 20.2R2, 20.3R1-S1, 20.3R2, 20.4R1, and all subsequent releases.

Junos OS Evolved: 20.3R1-S1-EVO, 20.3R2-EVO, 20.4R1-EVO, and all subsequent releases.

 

 

It has a cvss score of 10.0 which is the highest. 

 

Is Juniper still vulnerable or not?

 

Thanks

 



  <https://www.engardesecurite.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/main1-1-214x300.gif> 


Jean St-Laurent 

CISSP #634103


 

ddosTest me security inc


tel:   <tel:+14388069800> 438 806-9800 


site:   <https://ddostest.me/> https://ddostest.me 


email:   <mailto:jean () ddostest me> jean () ddostest me 

 

 

 

 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest.me () nanog org> On Behalf Of Hank Nussbacher
Sent: February 3, 2021 12:41 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: RTBH and Flowspec Measurements - Stop guessing when the attack will over

 

You forgot to mention software bugs:

https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content 
<https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA11101&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST> 
&id=JSA11101&cat=SIRT_1&actp=LIST

 

Note what Juniper states:

Workaround:
There are no viable workarounds for this issue

 

-Hank

 



But, this still does not helps to find a solution do an organization A that sends some flowspec our RTBH to 
organization B(presuming organization B will accept that),  and organization B do some reports of what is match with 
that flowspec or RTBH.

That, in my opinion, is the only way to stop guessing how long will an attack will last, and start to define the end of 
a flowspec/RTBH action based on real information related to that.
I want to close the feedback loop.

 

 

Em ter., 2 de fev. de 2021 às 13:07, Tom Beecher  <mailto:beecher () beecher cc> <beecher () beecher cc> escreveu:

Personally, I would absolutely, positively, never ever under any circumstances provide access to a 3rd party company to 
push a FlowSpec rule or trigger RTBH on my networks. No way.  You would be handing over a nuclear trigger and saying 
"Please break me at my earliest inconvenience." 

 

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 5:56 AM Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas () gmail com <mailto:fischerdouglas () gmail com> > 
wrote:

OK, but do you know any company the sells de Flowspec as a service, in the way that the Attack Identifications are not 
made by their equipment, just receiving de BGP-FlowSpec and applying that rules on that equipments... And even then 
give back to the customer some way to access those statistics?

I just know one or two that do that, and(sadly) they do it on fancy web reports or PDFs.
Without any chance of using that as structured data do feedback the anomaly detection tools to determine if already it 
is the time to remove that Flowsperc rule.

What I'm looking for is something like:
A) XML/JSON/CSV files streamed to my equipment from the Flowspec Upstream Equipments saying "Heepend that, that, and 
that." Almost in real time.
B) NetFlow/IPFIX/SFlow streamed to my equipment from the Upstream Equipment, restricted to the DST-Address that matches 
to the IP blocks that were involved to the Flowspec or RTBH that I Annouced to then.
C) Any other idea that does the job of gives me the visibility of what is happening with FlowSpec-rules, or RTBH on 
theyr network.

 

 

Em seg., 1 de fev. de 2021 às 22:07, Dobbins, Roland <Roland.Dobbins () netscout com <mailto:Roland.Dobbins () netscout 
com> > escreveu:

 





On Feb 2, 2021, at 00:34, Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas () gmail com <mailto:fischerdouglas () gmail com> > wrote:

 

Or even know if already there is a solution to that and I'm trying to invent the wheel.

 

Many flow telemetry export implementations on routers/layer3 switches report both passed & dropped traffic on a 
continuous basis for DDoS detection/classification/traceback. 

 

It's also possible to combine the detection/classification/traceback & flowspec trigger functions. 

 

[Full disclosure: I work for a vendor of such systems.]

 

--------------------------------------------

Roland Dobbins <roland.dobbins () netscout com <mailto:roland.dobbins () netscout com> >




 

-- 

Douglas Fernando Fischer
Engº de Controle e Automação




 

-- 

Douglas Fernando Fischer
Engº de Controle e Automação