nanog mailing list archives
Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)?
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 26 Feb 2021 17:40:18 -0500
In article <Pine.LNX.4.64.2102262007230.25288@cube> you write:
Hmm right... Somehow I tought that having that special Null MX will silently discard message... I dont know why... So, RFC 7505 is pretty much even pointless in my opinion. You have to do more.. to pretty much achieve the same.. Its just easier to not having MX on subdomains that does not serve as email destinations.. Less records in DNS..
Please reread RFC 7505 section 4. I presume you are aware that SMTP falls back to A records only if there is no MX record. If there is any MX record, null or otherwise, mail clients don't look for an A or AAAA. R's, John
Current thread:
- Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? borg (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? borg (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? borg (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? John Peach (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? John Levine (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? Alan Hodgson (Feb 26)
- Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 26)
