nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nice work Ron
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 20:33:59 +0100
Again, I'm not saying is the best way, is what the community *decided* before I added a clarification. The 50% was not
a change, just to make it explicit, what was the actual interpretation.
If you don't like it, stop complaining, and send a policy proposal, I could even support it, but I'm not convinced it
will reach consensus.
El 24/1/21 15:34, "NANOG en nombre de Masataka Ohta" <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel.es () nanog org en nombre
de mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> escribió:
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
> I fully understand what you mean, however, I don’t think this is a
> problem even if all the RIRs ask for “%50 or even 100%” of usage in
> the region.
So, you don't know how most, if not all, ISPs are operating
their network.
> That will make your life more complex, as you will need to obtain
It makes ISP's operations a lot more complex and a lot less
profitable to be ignored by almost all, if not all, ISPs.
Your theory that ISPs could have behaved otherwise is not
helpful in the real world of business and not practically
acceptable by RIRs mostly consisting of ISPs.
Masataka Ohta
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be
for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached
files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to
inform about this communication and delete it.
Current thread:
- Re: Nice work Ron, (continued)
- Re: Nice work Ron Masataka Ohta (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 23)
- Re: Nice work Ron Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 23)
- Re: Nice work Ron Matthew Petach (Jan 23)
- Re: Nice work Ron JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron John Sage (Jan 24)
- Past policies versus present and future uses Matthew Petach (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses John Sage (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rubens Kuhl (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
