nanog mailing list archives
Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections
From: Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 09:25:02 -0400
I think going to other countries gets us a different market (ie less video content/quality, probably significantly less upload due to 384k rates, etc). I suppose if you're trying to push an agenda it might be a good idea, but I can't imagine a reason we'd want to compare other countries *_*usage_ to the US. Just my opinion and thoughts. The only "definition of broadband" we get is from the FCC which trickles down to the states. Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 12:14 PM Livingood, Jason < Jason_Livingood () comcast com> wrote:
Does not need to be – just a suggestion based on the thinking that these locales may have more dense populations and thus perhaps higher FTTH penetration for a longer period of time. But the data from any network will certainly have some interest. *From: *Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com> *Date: *Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 11:36 *To: *"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com> *Cc: *Abhi Devireddy <abhi () devireddy com>, "nanog () nanog org" < nanog () nanog org> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Why does it have to be non-US? Josh Luthman 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:20 AM Livingood, Jason via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:I think the 10:1 ratio might have been great 5 years ago, when usage wasmore asymmetric. The last 5 yrs. have definitely changed the profile of a typical home user. A 4M upload pipe, will hit bottlenecks with all the collaboration that is happening remotely. I'm not sure ratio is the right thing to focus upon - especially as asymmetry has grown the last few years due to the rising using of streaming video services and greater availability of 4K-resolution content. Ratio seems like more a reflection of current applications and usage patterns. (It would be fascinating to see a non-US FTTH provider that was 1G/1G or greater share their actual usage ratio.) JL
Current thread:
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections, (continued)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Josh Luthman (Jun 01)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Jun 01)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 01)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Don Fanning (Jun 01)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 01)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe (Jun 03)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Steven G. Huter (Jun 03)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 01)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Josh Luthman (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Josh Luthman (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mike Hammett (Jun 01)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mike Hammett (Jun 01)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 02)
- Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections Mark Tinka (Jun 02)
