nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:06:00 -0800
On 11/26/21 1:44 PM, Jean St-Laurent via NANOG wrote:
This really hits my bs meter big time. I can't see how nat'ing is going to cause a 40% performance hit during connections. The article also mentions http2 (and later v3) which definitely make big improvements so I'm suspecting that the author is conflating them.Here are some maths and 1 argument kicking ass pitch for CFO’s that use iphones.*Apple tells app devs to use IPv6 as it's 1.4 times faster than IPv4* https://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-tells-app-devs-to-use-ipv6-as-its-1-4-times-faster-than-ipv4/ Build around that maybe?
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Max Tulyev (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Jose Luis Rodriguez (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mike Hammett (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Ca By (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Scott Morizot (Nov 27)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 26)
