nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 20:25:01 -0800
On Nov 27, 2021, at 7:39 PM, Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
Mark Tinka wrote:On 11/27/21 17:07, Masataka Ohta wrote: Because lengthy IPv6 addresses mean a lot more opex than IPv4.I disagreeTry to type in raw IPv6 addresses.
People are likely to use a technology originally developed because IPv4 had the same perception problem: DNS.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Grzegorz Janoszka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Christopher Morrow (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Fred Baker (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's sronan (Nov 28)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Masataka Ohta (Nov 28)
