nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network visibility
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 17:32:30 +0000
Mark, I haven’t. With SNMP and other standards, and most NMS’ having extensible interfaces, such tinkaing is rare. It certainly doesn’t rise to the level of “never works out of the box.” -mel
On Oct 20, 2021, at 10:06 AM, Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: On 10/20/21 18:38, Mel Beckman wrote:I’ve used many commercial NMS platforms. I’ve yet to find one that doesn’t work “out of the box”. Unless by “out of the box” you mean “clairvoyantly configured”. Please identify the ones you think fail your test.Have you always used an NMS that you've never had to have the vendor (or community) tweak in a manner that was mostly unique to your operation? If not, you're a very lucky man... Mark.
Current thread:
- Network visibility Nat Fogarty (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mark Tinka (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility bzs (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Daniel Seagraves (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 21)
- RE: Network visibility Kain, Becki (.) (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 21)
- RE: Network visibility Kain, Becki (.) (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Gerry Boudreaux (Oct 21)
- RE: Network visibility bzs (Oct 21)
