nanog mailing list archives
Re: Questions about IRR best practices
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:58:15 -0300
2. On the ARIN side, when ARIN-NONAUTH goes away next year, does that do away with our ability to do proxy route objects? Do we need to require all of our BGP customers to set up their own IRRs?
Not only ARIN. LACNIC and TC (the two IRRs covering the LAC region, TC for Brazil, LACNIC for Mexico and other Latin American countries) have strict non-proxy policies, and there is no -NONAUTH scape route.
3. On the RADb side, if we're turning up a new customer that doesn't have an IRR, and another ISP already has a proxy registration for that customer, is it sufficient for us to add that customer's AS to our customer AS-SET?
The problem with that is all of sudden the covering object could disappear. Rubens
Current thread:
- Questions about IRR best practices Lee Fawkes (Oct 22)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices Job Snijders via NANOG (Oct 22)
- Re: Questions about IRR best practices Rubens Kuhl (Oct 22)
