nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 and CDN's


From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 06:30:29 -0700

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 8:48 AM Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net> wrote:

On 10/22/21 11:13 AM, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
Another aspect that flabbergasts me anno 2021 is how there *still* are
BGP peering disputes between (more than two) major global internet
service
providers in which IPv6 is 'held hostage' as part of slow commercial
negotiations. Surely end-to-end IPv6 connectivity should be a priority?

Even the DNS root servers are not 100% reachable via IPv6.  I would think
IANA
would have some standard about reachability for root operators.

FWIW, I just was able to change my home office internet (I reside in the
most
densely populated county of Florida).  The new provider sold me a dual
stack
connection, however when they came to deliver it, there was no IPv6 as
promised.  After spending almost a week playing phone tag, I finally got
some
one with clue.  I was told they have no support if IPv6 and no plans to
ever
support IPv6 as there is no way to monetize it.

This leaves me in the same position as my prior circuit via the local cable
co. (no plans to offer IPv6) but at least it's faster than the 2 meg up
cable
service.

Until IPv6 becomes provides a way to make money for the ISP, I don't see it
being offered outside of the datacenter.


87% of mobiles in the usa are ipv6

https://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/





--
Bryan Fields

727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net


Current thread: