nanog mailing list archives
RE: possible rsync validation dos vuln
From: Jean St-Laurent via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:29:26 -0400
https://www.ncsc.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/oktober/29/aanstaande-bekendmaking-cvd-procedure-rpki -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+jean=ddostest.me () nanog org> On Behalf Of Niels Bakker Sent: October 29, 2021 2:01 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln * nanog () nanog org (Jean St-Laurent via NANOG) [Fri 29 Oct 2021, 19:57 CEST]:
The link doesn't work. 404 https://www.ncsc.nl/actueel/nieuws/2021/oktober/29/aanstaande-bekendm
| X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 The posted link works fine here but your MUA mangled it so you'll have to do some manual work to put the two parts together again. You're missing "aking-cvd-procedure-rpki" at the end.
What are the specs of that possible dos vuln?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Is is reflection or amplification or something else?
Maybe you missed the bit where the actual vulnerabilities are under embargo?
-- Niels.
Current thread:
- possible rsync validation dos vuln Randy Bush (Oct 28)
- Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln Nick Hilliard (Oct 29)
- Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln Randy Bush (Oct 29)
- Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln Barry Greene (Oct 29)
- Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln Nick Hilliard (Oct 29)
- Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln Nick Hilliard (Oct 29)
- Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln Randy Bush (Oct 29)
- RE: possible rsync validation dos vuln Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Oct 29)
- RE: possible rsync validation dos vuln Collider (Oct 29)
- Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln Niels Bakker (Oct 29)
- RE: possible rsync validation dos vuln Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Oct 29)
- Re: possible rsync validation dos vuln Nick Hilliard (Oct 29)
