nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 19:49:00 +0900
Randy Bush wrote:
it took five years of war to get rid of the tla/sla crap.
As backbone operators do not want to have large routing tables, TLA is a good idea. As you can see, TLA of IPv4 is /24, though there is no NLA.
and look at the /64 religion today[0].
It was /80, until I pointed out that IEEE1394 MAC
address is 64bit long.
Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Curran (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Carsten Bormann (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bill Woodcock (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Fred Baker (Sep 11)
