nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:08:19 -0700
I wasn't there at actual meetings at the time
but your opinion was?
but I find the notion that operators were ignored pretty preposterous too
so did we, the ops who were there at the time randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Eliot Lear (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC bzs (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Sabri Berisha (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC bzs (Sep 15)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Christopher Morrow (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 14)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Shane Ronan (Sep 14)