Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

[Jay Hennigan <jay () west net>]

On 9/15/21 09:31, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>
> > > > But in fact with local number portability, you cannot rely on the 
> > > > county
>                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > code to tell you where to route a telephone call anymore.
> > >
> > > Not. With geographical aggregation, you may route a call
> > > *anywhere* in the destination country.
>
> > You mean anywhere in the world. Calls to my number reach my cell phone no
> > matter where I go.
>
> You are confusing number portability and call forwarding.

You're confusing call forwarding with international roaming.

Obligatory back story. In the early days of international roaming I had 
cellular service in the US with AT&T. I traveled to Bulgaria for a week 
and took my phone with me. International rates were on the order of 
$3.95 per minute.

I deliberately left my phone turned off so as to avoid expensive 
incoming calls. On arrival I turned my phone on and made two calls to 
let people at home know I'd arrived. During the trip I would turn it on 
and make a call occasionally, total under ten calls, all outbound.

When I got home I would up with a bill totaling several hundred dollars. 
Every time someone called my number the call got routed to Bulgaria. The 
call then went back to the USA and hit my voicemail, so I got charged 
$3.95 twice for each of these calls.

I eventually got the bill resolved, but it took a very long time and 
multiple escalations. Suffice it to say that AT&T customer service reps 
are located nowhere near the "A" in "AT&T".

A year later I made another international trip. Ahead of time I called 
AT&T to ask them to disable voicemail so I wouldn't have to deal with 
that again. I finally was able to do so but that, too, took multiple 
calls to people very obviously not in "A".

--
Jay Hennigan - jay () west net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
503 897-8550 - WB6RDV