nanog mailing list archives
Re: Telecommunications network drafting software
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 09:18:20 +0200
On Sep 2, 2021, at 9:14 AM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote: OmniGraffle seems to have some traction.
Yep, that’s what I’ve always used. If I need to really clean something up, I save it out of Omnigraffle as a PDF, and
clean it up in Illustrator.
-Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Current thread:
- Telecommunications network drafting software Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 01)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software Fletcher Kittredge (Sep 01)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software Michael Hallgren (Sep 01)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software Mel Beckman (Sep 01)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software Eric Kuhnke (Sep 01)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software Måns Nilsson (Sep 01)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software Bill Woodcock (Sep 02)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software Måns Nilsson (Sep 01)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software John Mason (Sep 02)
- Re: Telecommunications network drafting software Amreesh Phokeer (Sep 02)
