nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12
From: Don Beal <don () depref net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 06:25:03 +0000
How can RPKI / OV prevent such a leak when there is no ROA for 2000::/12, what would 6762|2914|174|* invalidate against? Until a future where everything is 'valid', RPKI is unable to pare out less-specific conflicts. It does look like 3356 pulled the announcement, which is good. On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 4:48 AM Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 11:25 PM Ryan Hamel <administrator () rkhtech org> wrote:AS3356 has been announcing 2000::/12 for about 3 hours now, an aggregatecovering over 23K prefixes (just over 25%) of the IPv6 DFZ.interesting that this is leaking outside supposed RPKI OV boundaries as well. For example: 6762 3356 2914 3356 174 3356 (apologies to 174, I forget if they signed up to the 'doin ov now' plan)
Current thread:
- AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Ryan Hamel (Dec 07)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Christopher Morrow (Dec 07)
- RE: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Ryan Hamel (Dec 07)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Don Beal (Dec 07)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Heasley (Dec 07)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Christopher Morrow (Dec 07)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Don Beal (Dec 07)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Randy Bush (Dec 08)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Matthew Petach (Dec 09)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Geoff Huston (Dec 10)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Job Snijders via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Christopher Morrow (Dec 07)
- Re: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Warren Kumari (Dec 09)
- RE: AS3356 Announcing 2000::/12 Ryan Hamel (Dec 09)
