nanog mailing list archives

Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging

From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 19:46:54 +0100

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:56:44AM -0600,
 Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote 
 a message of 140 lines which said:

Are there any authoritative resources from said organizations saying
you shouldn't use their servers for your persistent ping
destinations?


Why not using RIPE Anchors, which are made to be pinged (reasonably)?

Current thread:

Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mike Hammett (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 08)
  - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mike Hammett (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Lukas Tribus (Feb 08)
  - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe (Feb 08)
- Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Tom Beecher (Feb 08)
  - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mike Hammett (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Christopher Morrow (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Mike Hammett (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Randy Bush (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging William Herrin (Feb 08)
    - Re: Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging Grant Taylor via NANOG (Feb 08)

(Thread continues...)