Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead?

[Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>]

On 1/15/22 21:16, Raymond Burkholder wrote:

> And in this discussion group, when MPLS is mentioned, does that 
> include VPLS?  Or do operators simply use MPLS and manually bang up 
> the various required point-to-point links?  Or is there a better way 
> to do this?
>
> For example, Free Range Routing can do do MPLS, but I don't think it 
> has a construct for VPLS (joining more than two sites together).

Hasn't the world moved on to EVPN?

Mark.