Re: Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

Because it is a single Internet, and what we do in some parts of Internet will affect others?

Because, at least in my case, I'm investing my efforts in what it seems to be the best in the long-term for the global 
community, not my personal preferences?
 
 

El 12/3/22 9:10, "William Herrin" <bill () herrin us> escribió:

    On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:58 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
    <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
    > Exactly, many previous unsuccessful discussions at IETF about 240/4: IPv6 is the only viable long-term solution.
    >
    > The effort to “reinvent” any part of IPv4 or patches to it, then test that everything keeps working as expected, 
versus the benefits and gained time, it is much best invested in continue the IPv6 deployment which is already going on 
in this region and the rest of the world.
    >
    > It would not make sense, to throw away all the efforts that have been already done with IPv6 and we should avoid 
confusing people.
    >
    > I just think that even this thread is a waste of time (and will not further participate on it), time that can be 
employed in continue deploying IPv6.


    Why are so many otherwise smart engineers so vulnerable to false
    dilemma style fallacies? There's no "either/or" here. It's not a zero
    sum game. If you don't see value in doing more with IPv4 then why
    don't you get out of the way of folks who do?

    Regards,
    Bill Herrin


    -- 
    William Herrin
    bill () herrin us
    https://bill.herrin.us/



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached 
files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to 
inform about this communication and delete it.