nanog mailing list archives

Re: V6 still not supported


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:58:24 -0400

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 5:36 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:


On 3/22/22 5:45 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

<snip>

right would have had any better chance of being adopted? My experience
with Cisco product managers at the time is that they couldn't give a
shit about the technical aspects of an ipng. If their silicon forwarding
couldn't handle it, they weren't interested unless customers were


Somewhere in this thread Randy sent a link to his ivtf
screed^H^H^H^H^H^Hposition-paper.
I think his point there was essentially: "Hey, vendors are coin operated,
they build what people
are asking for, if they are willing to pay AND if there are enough of them
paying"

Current thread: