nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:58:24 -0400
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 5:36 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:
On 3/22/22 5:45 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
<snip>
right would have had any better chance of being adopted? My experience with Cisco product managers at the time is that they couldn't give a shit about the technical aspects of an ipng. If their silicon forwarding couldn't handle it, they weren't interested unless customers were
Somewhere in this thread Randy sent a link to his ivtf screed^H^H^H^H^H^Hposition-paper. I think his point there was essentially: "Hey, vendors are coin operated, they build what people are asking for, if they are willing to pay AND if there are enough of them paying"
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported surfer (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 18)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Curran (Mar 21)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Curran (Mar 21)
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Curran (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported George Michaelson (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 22)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Joe Maimon (Mar 23)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 23)
