nanog mailing list archives
Re: V6 still not supported
From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:09:53 -0700
On Mar 30, 2022, at 08:09 , Jared Brown <nanog-isp () mail com> wrote: Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:When your ISP starts charging $X/Month for legacy protocol supportOut of interest, how would this come about?ISPs are facing ever growing costs to continue providing IPv4 services.Could you please be more specific about which costs you are referring to?
Costs of address acquisition Costs of CGNAT systems in lieu of address acquisition costs Costs of increasing support calls due to IPv4 life support measures in other networks. etc.
It's not like IP transit providers care if they deliver IPv4 or IPv6 bits to you.
True, but adding customers requires additional addresses at some point. IPv6 addresses are cheap compared to IPv4 addresses. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: V6 still not supported, (continued)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Carpenter (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Jared Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 25)
- Re: V6 still not supported John Kristoff (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Mar 30)
- Re: V6 still not supported Owen DeLong via NANOG (Mar 31)
