nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equinix routeservers (MLPE) behavior c/f no_export
From: "Elmar K. Bins" <elmi () 4ever de>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:22:03 +0200
Re Frank, thanks for the quickie, geier () geier ne tz (Frank Habicht) wrote:
it seems to be a not completely agreed/standardised question.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7947#section-2.2.4
[...]
https://docs.ixpmanager.org/features/route-servers/#rfc1997-passthru
[...]
Yeah, I know... I just don't know what Equinix actually does.
As said before, I assumed transparency (==passthru).
Any hard experience info would be helpful here :-)
Thanks again,
Elmar.
Current thread:
- Equinix routeservers (MLPE) behavior c/f no_export Elmar K. Bins (Oct 28)
- Re: Equinix routeservers (MLPE) behavior c/f no_export Frank Habicht (Oct 28)
- Re: Equinix routeservers (MLPE) behavior c/f no_export Elmar K. Bins (Oct 28)
- Re: Equinix routeservers (MLPE) behavior c/f no_export Frank Habicht (Oct 28)
