nanog mailing list archives
Re: jon postel
From: Noah <noah () neo co tz>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 19:47:22 +0300
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022, 00:18 Randy Bush, <randy () psg com> wrote:
my favorite is It's perfectly appropriate to be upset.
Ack.... I thought of it in a slightly
different way--like a space that we were exploring and, in the early days, we figured out this consistent path through the space: IP, TCP, and so on.
the impact of IP, TCP in improving human life across the globe in the last decades can not be overstated. Human enginuity through names like Google have enabled the age of information and access to information through addresses and digital trade routes have continued to ensure peace for humanity on the positive side of the communications spectrum. What's been happening over the last few years is that the IETF is filling
the rest of the space with every alternative approach, not necessarily any better. Every possible alternative is now being written down. And it's not useful. -- Jon Postel
I suppose original human ideas and thoughts tends to stand the taste of time. Iterations often times leads back to the beginning. Noah
Current thread:
- Re: jon postel, (continued)
- Re: jon postel Elmar K. Bins (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Grant Taylor via NANOG (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Carsten Bormann (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Grant Taylor via NANOG (Oct 17)
- RE: jon postel Adam Thompson (Oct 20)
- Re: jon postel Dave Taht (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Miles Fidelman (Oct 18)
- Re: jon postel michael brooks - ESC (Oct 18)
- Re: jon postel John Curran (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Greg Skinner via NANOG (Oct 17)
- Re: jon postel Noah (Oct 30)
- Re: Jon Postel Re: 202210301538.AYC Abraham Y. Chen (Oct 30)
- RE: Jon Postel Re: 202210301538.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Oct 30)
- Re: Jon Postel Re: 202210301538.AYC Donald Eastlake (Oct 31)
- RE: Jon Postel Re: 202210301538.AYC Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Oct 31)
- Re: Jon Postel Re: 202210301538.AYC William Allen Simpson (Oct 31)
- Re: jon postel Jay Hennigan (Oct 16)
