nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spectrum (legacy TWC) Infrastructure - Contact Off List


From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <lists () packetflux com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:13:13 -0700

The cost to build physical layer in much of the suburban and somewhat rural
US is low enough anymore that lots of smaller, independent, ISPs are
overbuilding the incumbent with fiber and taking a big chunk of their
customer base because they are local and care.  And making money while
doing it.


On Thu, Feb 2, 2023, 8:22 AM Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
wrote:

Mike Hammett wrote:

I selfishly hope they don't because that's where independent
operators will succeed. ;-)

Because of natural regional monopoly at physical layer (cabling
cost for a certain region is same between competitors but their
revenues are proportional to their regional market shares), they
can't succeed unless the physical layer is regulated to be
unbundled, which is hard with PON.

But, in US where regional telephone network has been operated
by, unlike Europe/Japan, a private company enjoying natural
regional monopoly, economic situation today should be no worse
than that at that time.

                                                Masataka Ohta


Current thread: