nanog mailing list archives
Re: About emails impersonating Path Network
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 11:39:47 -0800
On 2/7/23 11:33 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
At least with spear-phishing attacks you can bound the problem detection investigation since you know what your own domain's legit names are. Beyond that, I have no idea if any of the mailbox providers are doing anything about lookalike attacks. Email at least has the advantage that it is in hands of a user's provider who could care. CA's I'm sure couldn't care less.On 2/7/23 11:18, Michael Thomas wrote:FWIW, lookalike domains can and do happen with http too. Nothing unique about that to email.Then the bad guys throw in the occasional Cyrillic, etc. character that looks like a Roman one and things get even more fun.
Mike
Current thread:
- About emails impersonating Path Network Konrad Zemek (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Martin Hannigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Jay Hennigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Michael Thomas (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network Martin Hannigan (Feb 08)
- Re: About emails impersonating Path Network J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Feb 08)
