nanog mailing list archives
Re: TACACS+ server recommendations?
From: Drikus Brits <drikusinaus () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 08:42:16 +1000
from a commercial perspective, we've been using Radiator for the last ~7 years....been working really well, super flexible in terms of user group permissions, authorized commands etc + the upside for us was logging auth logs to SQL, both authentication and authorization logs....it's primarily aimed as a radius product but has excellent tacacs daemon capabilities. On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:12 AM Bryan Holloway <bryan () shout net> wrote:
Ah, the good old days when I could download the latest tac_plus code
from the Cisco FTP site, compile it, and off I go.
But I digress.
Curious if there are any operators out there that have a good
recommendation on a lightweight TACACS+ server for ~200 NEs and
access-control for 20-30 folks. Nothing too special, but some sort of
simple command-control auth would be nice.
Open-source is fine ... we've been looking at commercial options, but
they're all pretty pricey and have way more features than we need.
Thank you all in advance!
- bryan
Current thread:
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations?, (continued)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Christopher Morrow (Sep 21)
- RE: TACACS+ server recommendations? Kevin Burke via NANOG (Sep 22)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Tim Burke (Sep 22)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Mike Lewinski via NANOG (Sep 22)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Sep 23)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Alberto Vargas (Sep 23)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Christopher Morrow (Sep 21)
- Re: TACACS+ server recommendations? Bernhard Schmidt (Sep 25)
