nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 07:34:52 -0700
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 7:07 AM Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
William Herrin wrote:So, I've actually studied this in real-world conditions and TCP behaves exactly as I described in my previous email for exactly the reasons I explained.Yes of course, which is my point. Your problem is that your point of slow start has nothing to do with long fat pipe.
Well it doesn't show up in long slow pipes because the low transmission speed spaces out the packets, and it doesn't show up in short fat pipes because there's not enough delay to cause the burstiness. So I don't know how you figure it has nothing to do with long fat pipes, but you're plain wrong. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences?, (continued)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 01)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Saku Ytti (Sep 01)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Mark Tinka (Sep 01)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 04)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? William Herrin (Sep 04)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 04)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? William Herrin (Sep 04)
- Re: Lossy cogent p2p experiences? Masataka Ohta (Sep 04)
