Re: MACSEC

[Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>]

> On the DWDM side, expect to add between 0.3W of energy @ 100G, and 0.6W
> @ 400G, when encryption is enabled.
>
> Something to keep in mind if power and/or thermal management are crucial
> for you.


Are you talking about L1OE here, not MACSEC?

On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 9:42 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:

> On 12/19/24 03:07, Jason Bothe via NANOG wrote:
>
> > Quite a bit I’d say, particularly in WAN. It’s an easy and excellent
> > go-to for line rate encryption along waves and some transparent layer
> > 2 services state they support it but haven’t had an opportunity to
> > test personally. Double check the implementation for continuation of
> > rolling keys and so forth to ensure your expectations are met.
>
> On the DWDM side, expect to add between 0.3W of energy @ 100G, and 0.6W
> @ 400G, when encryption is enabled.
>
> Something to keep in mind if power and/or thermal management are crucial
> for you.
>
> Mark.