nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status
From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 23:06:21 -0300
Uuuuuu that's sounds great! Exactly what I was wondering. Create a VRF called BFD-RouteServer on each PE, on that VRF on each PE activate the IPs of Route-Server, and activate de BFD Sessions with the participants connected to that PE. And then, add a PBR deviation of BFD coming from participants to that Route-Server IP replicas. Having that weird Anycast of BFD deployed, now comes the part of making Route-Servers being aware of the status of those Distributed BFD Sessions. Em sáb., 21 de dez. de 2024, 22:23, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> escreveu:
Douglas Fischer wrote on 22/12/2024 00:29: Does any colleague have any clue about BFD session status propagation over BGP? this internet draft discusses the problem space https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd/ Unfortunately there are no known implementations of the protocol. Nick
Current thread:
- BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status Douglas Fischer (Dec 21)
- Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status Nick Hilliard (Dec 21)
- Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status Douglas Fischer (Dec 21)
- Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status Tom Beecher (Dec 21)
- Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status Nick Hilliard (Dec 22)
- Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status Mark Tinka (Dec 22)
- Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status Robert Raszuk (Dec 22)
- Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status William Herrin (Dec 22)
- Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status Robert Raszuk (Dec 23)
- Re: BGP AFI or SAFI for advertising BFD status Nick Hilliard (Dec 21)
