nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My!
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:14:25 +0200
On 12/27/24 05:15, Jason Bothe via NANOG wrote:
I’m thinking there is not a a wide market for them, not to mention last mile support. Folks that need 100 or 400 ports typically want point to point and at that juncture, wavelength or IPoDWDM makes sense as more than likely these are going between data centers and not to your average enterprise premises in a multi tenant building. Just MHO.
This is correct.It is a lot of capacity to put in the hands of a router that is sharing its hardware and capacity with other services that have nothing to do with plain transport. Also, it is a cheaper way to deliver transport capacity for both operator and customer.
Mark.
Current thread:
- MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Jason Bothe via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Aaron1 (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Edwin Mallette (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Edwin Mallette (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- RE: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Dec 26)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Tom Beecher (Dec 27)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Mike Hammett (Dec 27)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: MPLS and Carrier Ethernet, Oh My! Jason Bothe via NANOG (Dec 26)
